[Jukebox-list] Wurly 2400S/538 amp ??

[Don]

I can always count on you Ron,
Actually it usually is the pathologist who generates the autopsy report 
listing the cause of death.
d
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Rich" <rIonnnrich at yahoo.com>
To: "Jukebox mailing list" <jukebox-list at lists.netlojix.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Jukebox-list] Wurly 2400S/538 amp ??


> Dear Dr. Don,
>  I guess, from judging from your post, that I am also qualified as a "Dr." 
> The 538 is now playing beautiful music--I just changed  a flock of 
> condensers( going by what the original values, and polarities were in that 
> amp)--and away it went----
>  "Dr." Ron Rich
>
> Don <dontutt at telus.net> wrote:
>  "Well"... the radio is usually DEAD when I get it...
> ...so I keep an autopsy page to document what I replace along the way....
> it might later help me find an open or shorted something else..... ;-)
> plus I have attended a few autopsies in past.. so the name for the sheet 
> was
> obvious.
> Dr. Don
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ron Rich"
> To: "Jukebox mailing list"
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 8:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [Jukebox-list] Wurly 2400S/538 amp ??
>
>
>> Don,
>> "Autopsy" ?? I have never heard of anyone "doing an autopsy" on someONE
>> that is not dead, let alone on someTHING !
>> Thanks for checking--Ron Rich
>>
>> Don wrote:
>> WOW Ron!
>> You got a doozer there!
>> Wish I still had that unit in the shop.
>> Will check its autopsy notes (which I do on all repairs...)
>> Back at ya soon.
>> d
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Ron Rich"
>> To:
>> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 12:57 PM
>> Subject: [Jukebox-list] Wurly 2400S/538 amp ??
>>
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> A couple of questions on this Wurly 2400S/538 amp---
>>> # 1. Does anyone have any info on how to set the bias? (No info on
>>> schematic--nor anywhere else in the manual, that I can find)
>>> #2. Board parts layout shows a resistor "sitting" on the bias pot--but
>>> the unit I have is missing it, and it looks like it was never there? 
>>> Does
>>> anyone know what is correct--and the resistor value, if used? Also, 
>>> found
>>> many errors in the lay-out. Cap polarity is not correct for about half 
>>> of
>>> the lytics--printed foil markings on trace side are correct. The
>>> resistor/cap numbering on the schematic and the layout is also very
>>> confusing--if not wrong?
>>> Ron Rich
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Jukebox-list mailing list
>>> Jukebox-list at lists.netlojix.com
>>> http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/jukebox-list
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jukebox-list mailing list
>> Jukebox-list at lists.netlojix.com
>> http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/jukebox-list
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jukebox-list mailing list
>> Jukebox-list at lists.netlojix.com
>> http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/jukebox-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jukebox-list mailing list
> Jukebox-list at lists.netlojix.com
> http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/jukebox-list
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See 
> how.
> _______________________________________________
> Jukebox-list mailing list
> Jukebox-list at lists.netlojix.com
> http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/jukebox-list