[Jukebox-list] AMI Cartridge conversion
Jens Hultgren
drjukebox at gmail.com
Tue Nov 18 04:00:33 PST 2008
Actually, the G200 is where they went from total squareness to start
applying a little stylishness.They must've brought in a new designer at this
time, while also deserting the horizontal rack mechanism they had used from
the start for the new (but stolen from Rockola!) ferris wheel mech.
I had a G200 once but someone else wanted it, so I never got a chance to
work on it. There are some differences to the sound system compared to G80
and G120 - I wonder if they make a big difference in sound?
My first 50's jukebox was a red speckled Jensen G80 assembled in Denmark.
Jensen used their own cartridges and those weren't any good.
I guess the G200 should sound as good as the H and i but with more oomph?
Jens
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:03 AM, David Breneman <david_breneman at yahoo.com>wrote:
> --- On Mon, 11/17/08, Berry Bell <berrycbell at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't think there is a better sounding jukebox than
> > the AMI H or I,
> > period. Pretty amazing considering we're talking a
> > 12" woofer and small
> > horn tweeter. Only downside on these models is their
> > tempermental nature.
>
> Have you heard a G-200? With a four foot long bass horn
> with two 6" drivers, and a 16 inch long high-mounted
> treble horn, it sounds pretty good. Not that I'm
> trying to start an argument, but I've always seen the H
> as the point when AMI decided to compromise absolute
> sound quality to compete on styling with Seeburg.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jukebox-list mailing list
> Jukebox-list at lists.netlojix.com
> http://lists.netlojix.com/mailman/listinfo/jukebox-list
>
More information about the Jukebox-list
mailing list